• COMMUNITY
  • |
  • MY STUFF
  • |
  • DISCUSSIONS
  • |
  • CHAPTERS
  • |
  • GROUPS
  • |
  • PHOTOS
  • |
  • INVITE
  • |
  • EVENTS
  • |
  • FIND OTHERS
Blog Search
Blog Latest Comments
The photo is only half-comic, but you already knew that, right?
by Allen Rucker on Thursday, February 07, 2013
Great photo! Been there, done that.
by Anthony on Wednesday, January 30, 2013
Please excuse the typos and spelling. I type only with my left hand and I was right handed. I notice extra letters in w...
by Barbara on Thursday, January 03, 2013
It saddens me that I grew-up in a strong country that truly cared about it's citizens as well as the citizens of the wor...
by Barbara on Thursday, January 03, 2013
Donna, here is a great piece from a recent New York Times about how the movie is about a lot more that sex and disabilit...
by Allen Rucker on Thursday, December 27, 2012
Page  of  Total Items: 103

firstprevnextlast

“Rucker is a gifted observer-humorist, unleashing a straight-arrow honesty and a vibrant, penetrating wit while probing the most intimate aspects of contemporary life and human behavior…” (Publisher Weekly) Mr. Rucker lectures widely on the subject of living with disability. He is also a contributing editor to “New Mobility” magazine and the chairman of the Writers With Disabilities Committee at the WGA. He lives in LA with wife, Ann. They have two sons.
Allen Rucker
Bookmark and Share
Are We There Yet?
Posted by Allen Rucker
Friday, June 29, 2012
Comments (4)

Is there reason to be optimistic about the greater inclusion of characters and/or performers with disabilities in American film and TV? I’ve been watching this stuff for a while and I say yes. But don’t break out the Cristal just yet. No sea change has occurred. But do take notice. There are at least a new crop of shows featuring the disabled to watch and maybe, God forbid, serve as a spawning ground for others.

Let’s start with the movies. One big special-effects extravaganza of 2012, “Battleship,” which bombed here but made $300 million worldwide, features a military veteran who lost both legs playing a disabled character. And the Snow White movie,“Mirror Mirror,” also a worldwide hit at $162 million, featured a full complement of little people acting like, you know, people. Big year for little people, I’d say, with Peter Dinklage of “Game of Thrones” fame making the cover of “Rolling Stone.” Then there was the independent film, “Musical Chairs,” a feel-good movie about wheelchair ballroom dancing. Or the French film, “The Intouchables,” a story of a tetraplegic and his care-giver, considered the French cultural event of 2011 by the French public.

But probably the US disability movie of the year, winner of the Audience Award and a Special Jury Prize for Ensemble Acting at Sundance, is “The Surrogate,” now renamed “The Sessions,” written and directed by Ben Lewin, who is himself disabled. The film is a rendering of the true story of Mark O’Brien, a quad poet who, at 38, decides to hire a sexual surrogate to lose his virginity. Truth in reportage: I’ve only seen about twenty minutes of the film myself, but the performances of Helen Hunt as the surrogate and John Hawkes as Mark O’Brien are instantly riveting. Going in release later this year, this is Oscar material, in my humble opinion.

But the big dis-media story of 2012 is on TV – “Push Girls.” If you haven’t read about it or seen some very attractive ladies in chairs on “Ellen” or “Good Morning, America,” et al, then you live in a media blackout zone. “Push Girls” is a reality show on the Sundance Channel starring five young, with-it women who just happen to be wheelchair-mobile and have a boatload of attitude. “If you can’t stand up, stand out.” That kind of attitude. They have boyfriend problems, career problems, mom problems, pregnancy problems, dancing problems, all kinds of problems – the mother’s milk of reality TV. And they’re a hell of lot of fun to watch.

“Push Girls” has only been on the air for a couple of weeks, but there are already ripples of backlash. A very bright disability activist and thinker, Bill Peace, a cultural anthropologist and blogger at www.badcripple.blogspot.com, recently wrote me the following:

"The “good life” will remain elusive for people with a disability and the general public will be blissfully unaware of the harsh reality people with a disability must adapt to. Shows like “Push Girls,” a supposed reality show, are grossly misleading. I know no person with a disability that leads that sort of life style..."

I too knew of no person who leads that sort of life style, either, until I met the Push Girls, that is. That’s not entirely true. I know a number of young, attractive women in chairs, most of whom dream of making it in Hollywood, but not all. And I know a few Push Guys, too, who are ambitious, independent, and have their own measure of attitude. “Push Girls” are either a distorted, even unhealthy glamorization of people with disabilities or reflective of an emerging post-ADA generation of self-starters. Or maybe it’s both.

My reaction to Mr. Peace’s salient observation is to call in Bill Cosby. When "The Cosby Show" came on TV in 1984, all kinds of pundits trashed it because it wasn't a "realistic" view of black America. It was some kind of TV-induced fantasy, a world away from the real world of South Chicago or Hough or even “blacker” shows like “Sanford and Son” or “Good Times.” And they were right – it was a whole other reality that popped up on the screen. Cosby set out to shatter the stereotype of the poor beleaguered black and introduce white America to the then emerging black middle class. "Wait a minute. You mean blacks can be doctors and lawyers and not be on welfare and have intact families and care that their kids go to college?" It might sound silly now, but it was absolutely revolutionary in 1984.

Because of the Cosby show and what followed in its wake, my own kids, now grown, never thought of a black professional as anything special. Nor a black guy running for President. I would argue that you can draw a straight cultural line from the Cosby Show to the election of Barack Obama 24 years later.

Yes, many people with disabilities struggle mightily and are ignored, marginalized, and abused. And their struggle certainly needs to be acknowledged and confronted. But if the Push Girls are in fact part of a generational shift, even a small one, a rising, ambitious, self-motivated disability middle class, as it were, then the show could be more than just a one-off media nod to the crippled people. You might end up calling the whole bunch The Push Kids.

© 2012 Allen Rucker | Like Allen on Facebook

 
  • Visit Gerthro's profile
    Gerthro: Nice piece. Cosby is the perfect example.
     

  • Visit Todd's profile
    Todd: Doors are opening all over. Kurt Yaeger, the BMX racer who lost his leg, landed a recurring role in the upcoming season of "Sons of Anarchy". A young friend of ours with spina bifida just filmed a small role for an episode of that show as well. And Brock Waidmann, a teenager with spina bifida, was cast in "The Paul Reiser Show" and the upcoming NBC sitcom "1600 Penn". The disabled might be the new blacks, and the time is right for more boundaries to be shattered.
     

  • Visit Allen Rucker's profile
    Allen Rucker: I think there are some promising moves out there, but "the new blacks" is a double-edged sword. Black people are still woefully underrepresented on TV and black writers have a tough time finding work. It's still an uphill battle for all disenfranchised groups on television.
     

  • Visit tobym's profile
    tobym: I agree that a show like push girls does NOT show what life with an SCI really is like for the vast majority of people. I am also someone who despises "reality" TV because it is all very staged by the producers who want to drive ratings for their show. There are many examples where an event happens or questions people ask each other on the show come right after a camera angle "change". It is a positive thing to see these girls getting out and living lives actively but I agree that putting that image in front of the general public can be good and bad. Some people will think it is not really that hard a life and not give it a second thought. I hope more people will watch it and realize they can do more to help or change things for the better for people with SCI's. Maybe someone who never donated a cent will donate now. Maybe someone against stem cells will realize we may cure paralysis with it and educate themselves just a little because of the show. At the very least, the show is making people think about people living in wheel chairs which I believe has to be a good thing in the long run.