• COMMUNITY
  • |
  • MY STUFF
  • |
  • DISCUSSIONS
  • |
  • CHAPTERS
  • |
  • GROUPS
  • |
  • PHOTOS
  • |
  • INVITE
  • |
  • EVENTS
  • |
  • FIND OTHERS
Blog Search
Blog Latest Comments
That's great to hear, Krista. Many people trash "Glee" because Artie isn't an actor in a chair, but on the show and thro...
by The Myth of Walking on Wednesday, May 02, 2012
The Glee Project hired an actress using a wheelchair. My daughter auditioned for the part and didn't get it but we were ...
by Krista on Tuesday, May 01, 2012
Anthony, thanks so much for your always thoughtful responses. The simple point I was trying to make, at least about myse...
by The Myth of Walking on Wednesday, April 04, 2012
Al, thanks. I was alarmed at your opening paragraphs and then, as usual, impressed with your thoughtfulness and analysis...
by Anthony on Tuesday, April 03, 2012
Anthony, great stats. I wonder what percentage of adults have a disability and can walk those distances. The point is, I...
by The Myth of Walking on Tuesday, March 20, 2012
Page  of  Total Items: 75

firstprevnextlast

“Rucker is a gifted observer-humorist, unleashing a straight-arrow honesty and a vibrant, penetrating wit while probing the most intimate aspects of contemporary life and human behavior…” (Publisher Weekly) Mr. Rucker lectures widely on the subject of living with disability. He is also a contributing editor to “New Mobility” magazine and the chairman of the Writers With Disabilities Committee at the WGA. He lives in LA with wife, Ann. They have two sons.
The Myth of Walking
Bookmark and Share
The Way We Were
Posted by The Myth of Walking
Tuesday, Febuary 07, 2012
Comments (3)

If you haven’t checked out “Downton Abbey,” the smash English drawing room drama now in its second season on PBS, you might want to give it a look. Set in and around a humungous country manor house in the early decades of last century, it is what you might call British upper-class porn. Tune in and indulge in a luxurious existence where lords and ladies dress for dinner served by a staff of solicitous servants and life is just one refined pleasure and which-pearls-to-wear quandary after another. If the Great Depression had Busby Berkeley movies as escapist entertainment, The Great Recession of today has “Downton Abbey.”

What, you ask, does this have to do with paralysis? Everything, it turns out. As the second season opens, World War I is raging on the Continent and sucking life as we know it down a gaping foxhole. The heir to Downton, a dashing young heartthrob named Matthew Crawley, signs up for the war, like all patriotic Brits, and comes home a few episodes later paralyzed from the waist down. As he convalesces at the family compound, we get a sober glimpse at what it meant to be paralyzed before antibiotics, the ADA, and all the other advantages, physical and emotional, of our relatively enlightened age.

First, a little history. World War 1 was a hideous field of carnage in which hand to hand combat, mortar blasts, poison gas, shrapnel, and living in rat-infested trenches for months on end created the cruelest injuries imaginable, not the least of which was paralysis. Tens if not hundreds of thousands on both sides were paralyzed and their fate was grim. The rate of mortality for paraplegic soldiers was close to 80% -- 80%! – and the survivors were thought of as useless, helpless wards of society. Most paralyzed fighters died within three weeks of injury, killed by infection, usually right there in the cesspool of the war zone. No on-the-spot Medivac unit sped them to a state-of-the-art field hospital for treatment, a la Iraq.

Matthew, being an officer, not to mention an important character in the drama, survives without infectious complication. Unlike those burned or disfigured by shrapnel – see “Boardwalk Empire” – he is not a grotesque. What he shows us is the mental fallout of becoming paralyzed in 1918. He is, in his own mind, without hope or value. He repulses himself. If he can’t sire an heir to carry on the family legacy, no woman should want him. If he is like most paralytics at the time, he will spend the rest of his life in institutional idleness. He’s rich so his institution is a stately paradise. Most such vets withered away in medical snake pits or on the street.

Crawley is a lot like Lord Chatterley, the paralyzed husband of Lady Chatterley in the classic D.H. Lawrence novel of the same name, published in 1928. Also injured in The Great War, Chatterley sits idly by while his sexually-frustrated wife takes lovers to the third floor of their country estate before running off with the virile gamesman. This lord is, to Lawrence, a symbol of all of post-war English aristocracy – morose, impotent, and useless.

We don’t know what will happen to young Mr. Crawley as he copes with his condition. He probably won’t kill himself, a common remedy for paralytics of the age who lasted more than the typical three weeks. He has at least two women who love him madly, injury or no injury, and he will never have to work a day in his life, even if he wanted to. Like FDR – same period, same resources – he could end up doing extraordinary things. Hopeless and embittered as he currently is, he is made of “good stuff” and will probably prevail.

The whole brilliant series often plays like chocolate cake of the mind, but watching this character struggle with paralysis is humbling to me. I ask myself, “How would I have dealt with paralysis under those circumstances?” The stigma and the shame, I think, would have done me in. Or I would have bumped my knee on the commode, broken some skin, and died of infection in a month. When Mr. Crawley wallows in self-pity, I get it. In fact, everyone at Downton Abbey gets it.

In 1918, paralysis was not simply a misfortune that a hundred years of science and social progress have helped mitigate. It was, in the parlance of the time, a bloody curse.

© 2012 Allen Rucker | Like Allen on Facebook

 
  • Visit Kelsea's profile
    Kelsea: I really enjoy Downton Abbey, but I did not like the way that they dealt with Matthew's paralysis. I felt like they had a good opportunity to do something interesting with that story line, and instead all they did was spread misperceptions about the medical side of it (somewhat forgivable because there was a lot they didn't know about paralysis in the early 1900s) and then promote the belief that the only way to have a happy and fulfilled life is to fully recover and be able to walk again. I almost felt like the writer just decided to adopt (not to say steal) the ignorant attitudes in the Lady Chatterley story line, without actually doing any research about what paralysis is really like. A very disappointing aspect to what I otherwise believe is an entertaining show.
     

  • Visit Candace's profile
    Candace: Thanks Allen for the FYI about the show. I have not taken a look at it as of yet, but really we are still dealing with stigma and shame, you, me and all of us that live our lives with a disability. There are still many places in the world that consider having a disability or a family member with a disability shameful and they are treated as outcasts. I must say that the idea of the show illuminating what was (still is) and what can be with acceptance and inclusion would be a lovely education for all.
     

  • Visit The Myth of Walking's profile
    The Myth of Walking: Kelsea, you're right -- how they finally ended the story of Matthew Crowley's paralysis was a total cop-out! Two episodes later, he got up and walked across the room! His paralysis was only temporary. Personally, I was appalled when I watch that. Up to that point I was buying it. Now I have deep suspicions about the whole frothy series.